Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS Practice and procedure - application for interlocutory order °- application brought proceeding - whether application can be
original proceeding as a notice of motion.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 s.4
Federal Court of Australia Rules 0.13, 0.52
EDWARD CHRISTIAAN SENT and BRIAN FORSHAW and
JET CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED (in its capacity as Trustee of the JET CORPORATION AUSTRALIA TRUST)
V. No. G 282 of 1985
Northrop J. 17 February 1986
Melbourne
appeal from
as
separate
subsumed into
f Ar fay --
te yn eee ee mace ee Fee aera
wprery
eo. d an Pay
me
Sy
SUT pte ee ep eee ee oe
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
) ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) V. No. °G 282 of 1985 ) )
GENERAL DIVISION BETWEEN :
EDWARD CHRISTIAAN SENT and BRIAN FORSHANW Applicants
and
JET CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA PTY, LIMITED (in its capacity as Trustee of the JET CORPORATION AUSTRALIA TRUST) Respondent
COURT: NORTHROP J.
DATE: 17 FEBRUARY 1986
PLACE: MELBOURNE
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: -
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs of the application.
(Settlement and entry of Orders is dealt with in 0.36 of the Rules of Court.)
hae
—---.
ee
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V. No. G 282 of 1985
wee ww
GENERAL DIVISTON
BETWEEN :
EDWARD CHRISTIAAN SENT and BRIAN FORSHAW Applicants
and
JEL CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED (in its capacity as Trustee of the JET CORPORATION AUSTRALIA TRUST) Respondent
COURT: NORTHROP J.
DATE: 17 FEBRUARY 1986
PLACE: MELBOURNE
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
There is before the Court an application identified as V. No. G 282 of 1985 in which Edward Christiaan Sent and Brian Forshaw are named as applicants and Jet Corporation of Australia Pty. Limited (in its capacity as Trustee of the Jet Corporation Australia Trust) is named as respondent. The application is headed "APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL". It is addressed to the respondent care of its solicitors. It contains a notification that before taking any step in the proceeding the respondent must enter an appearance in the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate