Boehm, E.L. v Department of Industry & Commerce [1986] FCA 331

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALTA

)

) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NO. VG 288 of 1986

)

)

GENERAL DIVISTON

BETWEEN

ERVIN _LAJOS BOEHM Applicant

g

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE Respondent

THE COURT: Sweeney Jd.

DATE 1 August, 1986

PLACE Melbourne

EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT

In this case, I am satisfied that the application should be refused. The tribunal, in its decision, which is the subject of the application, reserved liberty to apply to Mr Boehm in respect of a number of matters. He has not sought to exercise that

liberty to apply or to seek any extension of time for its

exercise.

I am unable to say that the applicant has shown good reasons

for his very considerable delay in seeking to bring an appeal. nor

pores an

Pa - has he been able to indicate to me any question of law /SM respect '

es (9 RECE WE mm ras _ 12 AUS BeS

tere ee rs , ey

ores a5]

oe

¢

wee ee eee eee Y :

Aes

ae

eer rr cer

<

2.

of which the court could form an opinion that he had arguable

prospects of success.

I am not clear from what he said what that suggested question of law might be and certainly IT am not able to form any opinion that he has some prospect of success in relation to any question of law said to arise in respect of the matter. Accordimly, the

application is refused.

I certify that this and the preceding one (1) page are a true copy of the Reasons for

Judgment herein of The Honourable Mr. Justice Sweeney.

Dated: 1 August, 6 a eel

Associate

way sateen Sr oe Sear Rad

wo

sue

soo

wpe Sere ' et tae' .

ote en re or ee eo oe a- vin fea, metas oan wot