IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALTA ) ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NO. VG 288 of 1986 ) ) GENERAL DIVISTON BETWEEN ERVIN _LAJOS BOEHM Applicant g DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE Respondent THE COURT: Sweeney Jd. DATE 1 August, 1986 PLACE Melbourne EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT In this case, I am satisfied that the application should be refused. The tribunal, in its decision, which is the subject of the application, reserved liberty to apply to Mr Boehm in respect of a number of matters. He has not sought to exercise that liberty to apply or to seek any extension of time for its exercise. I am unable to say that the applicant has shown good reasons for his very considerable delay in seeking to bring an appeal. nor pores an Pa - has he been able to indicate to me any question of law /SM respect ' es (9 RECE WE mm ras _ 12 AUS BeS tere ee rs , ey ores a5] oe ¢ wee ee eee eee Y : Aes ae eer rr cer < 2. of which the court could form an opinion that he had arguable prospects of success. I am not clear from what he said what that suggested question of law might be and certainly IT am not able to form any opinion that he has some prospect of success in relation to any question of law said to arise in respect of the matter. Accordimly, the application is refused. I certify that this and the preceding one (1) page are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of The Honourable Mr. Justice Sweeney. Dated: 1 August, 6 a eel Associate way sateen Sr oe Sear Rad wo sue soo wpe Sere ' et tae' . ote en re or ee eo oe a- vin fea, metas oan wot