Rumpf, Re B.J. Ex Parte The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1986] FCA 507
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
(Not for publication or distribution)
No. 533 of 1986
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE
OF VICTORIA
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT
Coram:
Date:
~ eevee ve wrvw
Re: BARRY JAMES RUMPF
Ex parte: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN
BANKRUPTCY (as trustee of
the bankrupt estate of
Barry James Rumpf)
(Applicant)
E
BARRY JAMES RUMPF',
CANTENAE PTY. LTD., ADAVON
NOMINEES PTY. LTD. and
WELSH INVESTMENTS PTY.
LTD.
(Respondents)
Ryan J.
16 October 1986
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This application is made on behalf of the Official
trustee as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Barry James
Rumpf.
By the application, the Official Trustee seeks
declarations and consequential orders in respect of certain
assets which have been effectively used in and generated by
the conduct of two businesses carried on respectively under
ee
'
aay
r
wen ee
wor.
cere ee says rot
aT,
ste
i.
ae
fee et ae gn eee pee ee ee oes,
the names of R. J. Kirwan and Associates and Combined Group
Services.
I am satisfied on all of the evidence before the court-
that all of the assets comprised in the businesses
respectively carried on under those registered business names
are property of which the bankrupt, Barry James Rumpf, is the
beneficial owner, of over which he has a general power of
appointment.
As such, in my view, those assets are "property" as
defined in s.5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and are "property
of the bankrupt" as defined in the same section.
I am led to the conclusion which I have just indicated,
by the following facts and events which I consider have been
clearly established by the evidence. However, the recital
which I am about to give should not be taken as exhaustive of
all of the facts which lead to, or tend to support, the
conclusion to which I have come.
In 1980 the two businesses which, for the sake of
brevity I shall hereafter call "the cleaning business" and
"the security business", were sold on terms which provided
that Mr. and Mrs. Kirwan and Mr. and Mrs. Eddy as vendors
should receive a consideration amounting in all to $50,000
per couple per year for the next 10 years.
rerrece es
weasee pee
we =
——
y
moon
or
one
te
Vat om
Re
hoe
+
Ase
. Ye
>
z a
ore te me pes pe ae
The purchaser of the cleaning business was Tanavent
Nominees Pty. Limited and the purchaser of the security
business_was Tertiary Nominees Pty Limited. Both of those.
companies had common directors, Mr. Rumpf and two otherwise
unidentified gentlemen with Chinese names, Ng Kim Ling and
Chan Wai Chung. By 1 July 1983 the company controlling the
cleaning business and the security business changed to Peter
Brian Pty. Limited and Burra Anna Nominees Pty. Limited
respectively.
Peter Brian Pty. Limited had the same directors as
Tanavent Nominees Pty. Limited and Tertiary Nominees Pty.
Limited, being Mr. Rumpf and the two other, presumably
Chinese, gentlemen. The directors of Burra Anna Nominees
Pty. Limited were Mr. Rumpf and Fifth Minrip Pty. Limited.
On 18 June 1985 Tenth Cantenae Pty. Limited resolved to
purchase the cleaning business and the security business as
trustee for the Anzac No. 11 fTfrust. The minute which
embodies that resolution recited in part;
"Resolve that as at 1 July 1985 the company
acquire, as trustee, a group of businesses
carried on under the following names:-
R.J. Kirwan & Associates
Combined Group Services
Kirwan Security Services
Kirwan Group Services
from Peter Brian Pty. Ltd. and Burra Anna
Nominees Pty. Ltd.
iedetnt ae)
Further resolved that the basis of the purchase
shall be the net tangible assets as set out in
the accounts at 30th June, 1985 plus a further
amount for goodwill of one million dollars."
It is a_strong inference from the facts disclosed to the-
court that a trustee acting in the best interests of its
beneficiaries would not have regarded $1 million as an
appropriate price to pay for the goodwill of the businesses
which Tenth Cantenae Pty. Limited resolved to acquire.
Previously, it seems, Tenth Cantenae Pty. Limited had
been a shelf company and, until 30 June 1984 had been a
vehicle for the conduct of a newly founded-business of a Mr.
Torrance and a Mr. Teal who were clients of Mr. Rumpf in his
capacity as a chartered accountant. Even at that time, Tenth
Cantenae Pty. Limited was purportedly the trustee for the
Anzac No. 11 Trust. That trust was constituted by a deed of
trust dated 2 September 1981. According to Mr. Teal, the
trust remained dormant because the business founded by him
and Mr. Torrance did not generate any profits in the early
years of its existence which could be impressed with the
character of trust funds of the Anzac No. 11 Trust.
It appears that, when Messrs Torrance and Teal no
longer wished to use Tenth Cantenae Pty. Limited as a vehicle
for their business venture, they arranged with Mr. Rumpf for
their business to be sold by Tenth Cantenae Pty. Limited.
Presumably, that company and its still dormant Anzac No. 11
Trust simply went back on to the shelf. At all events, there
is no evidence of any injection of funds into either Tenth
Cantenae Pty. Limited or the Anzac No. 11 Trust to enable the
purchase_in June 1985 of either the cleaning business or the-
security business.
It seems that from 1980 onwards all major decisions in
respect of both the cleaning business and the security
business were taken by Mr. Rumpf. Employees of the cleaning
business and the security business were paid through one or
other of two Queensland-based firms, Southern Labour Pool and
West Coast Labour Pool, by means of cheques drawn on
Queensland banks.
The bank accounts of those firms were kept in funds by
periodic advances from the cleaning business and the security
business. Also, from time to time, moneys were drawn on the
Queensland account of either Southern Labour Pool or West
Coast Labour Pool and paid either to Mr. Rumpf as director's
er consultant''s fees or paid at his direction; for example,
to an account at the Bendigo building Society standing in the
name of Edwin Ross Irwin from whom, if he exists, Mr. Rumpf
holds a power of attorney. The proprietor of both of the
business names "Southern Labour Pool" and "West Coast Labour
Pool" is Welsh Investments Pty. Limited of which the
directors are Mr. Rumpf and Tenth Wakool Pty. Limited of
which company Mr. Rumpf is, in turn, a director.
wae ae en
wea ee ere,
wr MIA,
PU re vag ee
a ee eee
> roe
see oe
Mr. Rumpf has admitted that he controls Welsh
Investments Pty. Limited. Substantial sums of between $1500
and $3000 a fortnight were drawn in cash by Mr. Todd, an-
employee of the cleaning business and the security business,
on Mr. Rumpf's instructions from both of those businesses.
The money was placed in sealed envelopes and put in the
firm's safe and thereafter collected by somebody unknown to
Mr. Todd, but clearly believed by him to have been Mr. Rumpf.
Moreover, although Mr. Rumpf this morning disputed the
inference that he had, in fact, received that money, as Mr.
Meagher reminded me, he showed no reaction to the evidence
given by Mr. Todd yesterday and took no advantage of the
opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Todd or otherwise to suggest
that those very substantial sums had been misappropriated.
It is significant, in my view, that none of the other
matural persons whose identity has been established by
reference to such documents as have been able to be found,
has made any claim to a beneficial interest in any of the
assets of the cleaning business or the security business or
otherwise in the trust property presumptively vested in Tenth
Cantenae Pty. Limited,
I raised with Mr. Meagher this morning the concededly
remote possibility that somebody other than Mr. Rumpf may
have acquired a vested interest in some part or other of the
"
trust estate of which Tenth Cantenae Pty. Limited is the
trustee. Such a person could still be entitled to funds in
the hands of the Official Trustee if his claim could be
substantiated. Indeed, it might be to the benefit of that-
person for the remaining assets of the businesses to be
vested in the Official Trustee rather than be simply allowed
to waste.
It must also be remembered that the identity of any
such person can be presumed to be within the knowledge of Mr.
Rumpf. If such a person exists, Mr. Rumpf has apparently
made the judgment that the interests of that person are
better served by preserving his or her anonymity than by
disclosing the identity of that person and by substantiating
that person's beneficial interest in any of the assets in
question in this application.
Accordingly, I propose to make orders in terms of the
application in this matter. Iwill make a declaration in
terms of paragraph 1 of the application; an order in
accordance with paragraph 2; a declaration in the form of
paragraph 4 and an order in respect of the shares of Welsh
Investments Pty. Limited in the form of paragraph 5.
I understand that there may be some small amounts of
money still standing to the credit of Southern Labour Pool or
West Coast Labour Pool or both of those firms. Accordingly,
Iomake a declaration in terms of paragraph 6G, and I order
that the costs of this application be taxed and paid out of
the estate of the bankrupt. I reserve liberty to any party
to apply-for further orders or directions in this matter and-
I include in that reservation a right in any person not a
party to the application who may wish to claim a beneficial
interest in any of the assets with which this application has
been concerned, to pursue that claim.
MR. BRETT: If your Honour pleases.
MR. MEAGHER: Tf your Honour pleases. Your Honour, in
paragraph 6 of the application, there is an error. It
refers to the Western Labour Pool. All the evidence -
it is the West Coast Labour Pool. Yes.
HIS HONOUR: West Coast, yes. The order should be amended to
reflect that correction.
MR. MEAGHER: If your Honour pleases.
HIS HONOUR: In paragraph 7, I think the word, "state",
should read "estate" too, Mr. Meagher. Is there
anything else that you wish to be included.
MR. MEAGHER:
your Honour about today.
No, your Honour, that
release of the exhibits?
HIS HONOUR:
Yes, the exhibits
will be -
is all we need trouble
Would your Honour order the
they all came, I
think from your client, did they not, Mr. Meagher? - I
will order
custody of the Official Trustee.
MR. MEAGHER:
that the
If your Honour pleases.
I certify that
exhibits be
released into the
this and
the preceding eight (8)
pages are a
the Reasons for
herein of the
Mr. Justice Ryan.
Dated:
true copy of
Judgment
Honourable
o- "fe S9PPO
Associate
poe reper le
aan
Sop a san tee e+
- oe
were. tae