Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT No. 581-2
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
No. £.127 of 1987
ed
R.J. KADEN & L.M. KADEN
Applicants
»Oo
THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
Respondent
EX-TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BURCHETT J.
This 1S an application brought on behalf of a bankrupt and his wife, who have been summonsed to give evidence under s.81l
of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, for an order that the summonses be
set aside, and alternatively seeking adjournment of the
summonses.
There 1S also an application that access be granted to the original application, and supporting material, for the issue of the summons under s.81 in respect of the bankrupt's wife, Mrs. Lynette Mary Kaden. As to that matter, there 1S no opposition to a grant of access, and I do not think 1t 1S necessary to say
anything more about it.
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
No. E.127 of 1987
we
R.J. KADEN & L.M. KADEN
Applicants
THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
Respondent
EX-TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BURCHETT J.
This is an application brought on behalf of a bankrupt and his wife, who have been summonsed to give evidence under s.81
of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, for an order that the summonses be
set aside, and alternatively seeking adjournment of the
summonses.
There 1s also an application that access be granted to the original application, and supporting material, for the issue
of the summons under s.81 1n respect of the bankrupt's wife, Mrs. Lynette Mary Kaden. As to that matter, there 1s no opposition to a grant of access, and I do not think it is necessary to say
anything more about it.
The application has been brought at extremely short notice, and a question was raised on behalf of the Official Trustee as to whether it ought not to be adjourned to enable him to put on evidence. However, I have reached a clear conclusion on the material presented very fully and fairly to the Court on behalf of the applicants, and I do not think that it is
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate