Abduramanoski, E. & Anor v Aidan Nominees Pty Ltd as trustee for the Aiden City Centre Markets Unit Trust & Ors [1987] FCA 607

¥ '

Fy «

JUDGMENT No. 607/21.

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - interrogatories - application for leave

to interrogate - historical background to leave requirement ~ practice of leave application - criteria - necessity and utility - flexibility of procedure - use of draft anterrogatories - determination of leave and objections at one hearing - alternative short statement of issues - interrogatory by way of request for

particulars ~ interrogatories as to implications.

Federal Court Rules 0.16 r.1

Australian High Court and Federal Court Practice (CCH) Vol.1 5-501 Bray's Law of Discovery and Digest (1885)

Aste v Stumore (1883) 13 QBD 326

Tye v Willoughby (1894) 38 Sol. Jo. 338

Codd v Delop (1906) WN 57, 78

Conde v 2KY Broadcasters Pty Ltd (1982) 2 NSWLR 221

Nella v Kingia Pty Ltd (No. WAG 18 of 1983 unrep. French J. 4/9787)

ESTREF ABDURAMANOSKI and ZERA ABDURAMANOSKI v AIDAN NOMINEES PTY LTD as Trustee for the AIDAN CITY CENTRE MARKETS UNIT TRUST and BINDOOK PTY LTD

AIDAN NOMINEES PTY LTD as trustee for the AIDAN CITY CENTRE MARKETS UNIT TRUST v ESTREF ABDURAMANOSKI, ZERA ABDURAMANOSKI,

PATRICK EDWARD MULLALLY and JUDITH MARGARET MULLALLY, AND BINDOOK PTY LTD

NO. WAG 129 of 1986

French J. REE Perth ar 2 November 1987 « 9NOV (987

eo 6F 1A , Bs ;

to

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION

NO. WAG 129 OF 1986

BETWEEN: ESTREF ABDURAMANOSKI and ZERA ABDURAMANOSKI

Applicants

and

AIDAN NOMINEES PTY LTD as Trustee for the AIDAN CITY CENTRE MARKETS UNIT TRUST First Respondent and BINDOOK PTY LTD Second Respondent AND BETWEEN: AIDAN NOMINEES PTY LTD as trustee for the AIDAN CITY CENTRE MARKETS UNIT TRUST Cross Claimant

and

ESTREF ABDURAMANOSKI and ZERA ABDURAMANOSKI

First Cross Respondents

and

PATRICK EDWARD MULLALLY and JUDITH MARGARET MULLALLY

Third Parties to the First Respondent's Cross Claim