Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT No. 652.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
) ) ) ) BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE ) No. G366 of 1987 ) ) ) )
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF A SINGLE JUDGE
RE : JOSEPH HEDRLIN Appellant EX PARTE: M.C. DONNELLY Respondent JUDGES MAKING ORDER: Beaumont, *Gummow and Finfeid Jd. DATE OF ORDER: 29 October 1987
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER
BEAUMONT J. The Court is of the opinion that leave to appeal against order 1 made by Walcox J. on 14 July should be refused. We would add that nothing has been put to us which would suggest that Walcox J. erred in any respect in making this order. The Court 1s also of the opinion that application for leave to appeal against order No. 2 made by Wilcox J. on 14 July should be dismissed. The Court is further of the view that leave to appeal against order No. 3 made by Wilcox J. on 14 July 1987 should be refused. Again, nothing has been put to us which would suggest that Wilcox J. was in error in any respect in this matter also. The Court 1s of the opinion that the appellant should pay the
trustee's costs of to-day's applications thus far dealt with.
I certify that this page 1s a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment the Court.
Dated: Q5 -//-37
Associate
Oo ee re te
a
ore
a
oe
tote
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate