Zohar, Re D.A. Zohar, Ex parte D.A. [1988] FCA 368
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
) LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT )
)
)
OF THE STATE OF
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
NO. 200 of 1987
RE: DAVID ALAN ZOHAR
Bankrupt
EX PARTE: DAVID ALAN ZOHAR
Applicant
MINUTE OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: FRENCH J.
DATE OF ORDER: 11 JULY 1988
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The composition accepted by the creditors of David Alan
Zohar by special resolution passed at a meeting of the
creditors on 7 June 1988 be approved.
2. The bankruptcy of David Alan Zohar be annulled.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in
Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
OF AUSTRALIA
)
)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT )
)
)
OF THE STATE OF
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
NO. 200 of 1987
RE: DAVID ALAN ZOHAR
Bankrupt
EX PARTE: DAVID ALAN ZOHAR
Applicant
CORAM: FRENCH J.
11 JULY 1988
EX _TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application brought under s.74 of the
Bankruptcy Act 1966 for approval of a composition. The bankrupt
also seeks an order that his bankruptcy be annulled.
Mr Zohar became bankrupt on his own petition on 16 March
1987. The report of the Official Trustee discloses that he is a
married man, aged 38 years, and that his wife, Julie Zohar, 35
years, is also a bankrupt. They have one child aged 4 years, who
is partly dependent on him for support. He is presently employed
as a casual relief teacher with the Education Department,
receiving a net wage of $100 per day when on call and otherwise as
a mathematics tutor on a net wage of about $300 per week. He pays
rent of $130 per week for his residence. The background to his
bankruptcy, which is also set out in the report, discloses that he
had been employed full time as a teacher with the Education
Department for 6 years up until 1983. In June of that year he and
his wife began trading in partnership as "Australian School of
Mathematics", initially operating from home and then from rented
premises in Palmyra and Subiaco. In June 1984, Mr Zohar' resumed
teaching full time with the Education Department at Governor
Stirling Senior High School, but continued his tutoring on a
part-time basis from home. The income that he could earn from
that activity declined as he was unable to commit the time
required to private pupils. In August 1985 he stopped full time
teaching and became a casual relief teacher and resumed full time
tutoring from home. However, the income generated by that
activity was not as anticipated and indeed, was substantially
reduced for long periods during the Christmas holidays. He did
attempt to obtain employment in Sydney and Melbourne in December
1986 and subsequently sought assistance from Melsom Robson & Co.
with a view to seeking relief under Part X of the Act. He had
incurred liabilities by way of personal loans from the Perth
Building Society and the W.A. Teachers Credit Society, in the sums
of $5,000 and $1,700 respectively. Those amounts together with
the use of various credit cards had enabled him to maintain
mortgage repayments on his house at Noranda. In January 1987,
however, the W.A. Teachers Credit Society issued a notice of
demand and commenced proceedings under their mortgage. That
mortgage over the family home, which had been taken out in
December 1984 to finance construction of the house, secured a
principal of $61,000 repayable initially at $840 per month, but
later at $944 monthly. A second mortgage to the ANZ Bank secured
an advance of $25,000, borrowed in October 1985. $10,000 had been
for home improvements and $15,000 to acquire shares in a company
called Promin Holdings Limited. The ultimate shortfall to the ANZ
Bank after sale of the house in August 1987 was $25,162.00.
3.
As he was unable to pay his creditors, Mr Zohar filed a
petition in bankruptcy on 16 March 1987.
His statement of affairs disclosed assets amounting to
$6,650 and liabilities totalling $36,995. To the present date
8 proofs of debt totalling $40,665 have been received in the
estate, of which five, for a total of $33,167, have been admitted
to rank for dividend. Three, amounting to a total of $7,498, have
not, at the date of the report, been resolved. There have
apparently been realisations of $1,556 from the sale of shares in
Promin Holdings Limited. However, the Official Trustee
subsequently formed the view that these moneys were properly part
of the bankrupt estate of Mr Zohar's wife and they have since been
transferred to that estate. There are unrealised some 9,600
options in Promin Holdings Limited, but these, it is said, have no
market value. No dividend has as yet been paid in the bankruptcy.
The terms of the composition, 1n substance, amount to an
offer to contribute to his creditors $10,000 which moneys are _ to
be provided by Mr Phillip Finkelstein. The money has' evidently
already been paid to the Official Trustee who holds it in the
Common Investment Fund and reports that it is sufficient to pay a
dividend of 27 cents in the dollar to all proved and _ known
creditors.
The composition proposal was put to a meeting of
creditors held on Tuesday, 7 June 1988. Its terms were as
follows:-
4.
"1. That payment of all the proper costs, charges and
expenses of and incidental to the proceedings and
all fees payable to the Official Trustee in
Bankruptcy shall constitute a first charge on the
moneys referred to in paragraph 3 hereof.
2. That payment of all priority debts directed to be
so paid under the Act in the distribution of the
property of a bankrupt shall constitute a_ second
charge on the moneys referred to in paragraph 3
hereof.
3. That the Composition shall be paid on all proved
debts from the following funds:
(a) From all moneys in my estate held by the
Official Trustee in the Common Investment
Funds.
(b) From the sum of $10,000 to be provided as set
out in paragraph 4 hereof.
4. That the payment of the Composition be secured in
the following manner:
Loan from Phillip Finkelstein of 7 Wren Street,
Dianella 6062 (cheque attached). Mr P.W.
Finkelstein expects this money to be returned if my
creditors do not accept the Composition. ie. it is
only offered subject to an approval of the
Composition by Creditors."
At a meeting of the creditors held on Tuesday, 7 June
1988, a special resolution was passed in accordance with
sub-s.74(4) of the Bankruptcy Act accepting the proposal and the
Court is now asked to give its approval to that composition.
The Official Trustee, in his report to the creditors,
expressed the opinion that the terms of the proposal would be for
the benefit of the general body of creditors. In his report to
the Court he has stated that he is not aware that the conduct of
the bankrupt either prior to or since the date of bankruptcy has
been other than satisfactory.
5.
The bankrupt attributes his bankruptcy to the failure of
his investment in the company, Promin Holdings Limited, and the
incurring of excessive liabilities in completing and furnishing
his former house at 9 Gough Place, Noranda. According to the
Official Trustee, the major causes of bankruptcy are as stated by
the bankrupt, with the additional contributing factors of long
periods of unemployment and excessive use of credit facilities.
There is no suggestion that any offences have been committed by
the bankrupt and all non-assenting creditors have been advised of
the application.
In my opinion, it is established by these materials that
the composition will be for the benefit of the creditors and there
is no consideration of public interest or other relevant factor
which would require me to withhold the Court's approval to that
composition. I will order that the composition accepted by the
creditors of David Alan Zohar by special resolution passed at a
meeting of creditors on 7 June 1988 be approved.
The second limb of the application is for annulment of
the bankruptcy. This question raises a separate exercise of
discretion by the Court under s.74 and it has been said frequently
that the fact of approval of the composition does not necessarily
lead to the consequence that the bankruptcy be annulled.
Questions of public interest and commercial morality are relevant
to that later discretion. In my opinion, however, there is no
issue of public interest or commercial morality disclosed which
would prevent me from making the order that is sought, and I will
order that the bankruptcy of David Alan Zohar be annulled.
I certify that the preceding five
(5) pages are a true copy of the
Ex tempore Reasons for Judgment of
his Honour Justice French.
Associate: DebewS~
Date: \ SudQ (ASF
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G.L. Kelly
Solicitors for the Applicant: Messrs. Marks Healy & Sands
Mr R.J. Busher appeared on behalf of the Official Receiver
Date of Hearing: i1 July 1988
Date of Judgment: 11 July 1988