Vilips, P.K. Re v Vilips, P.K. Ex Parte [1988] FCA 452
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
JUDGMENT No. 4:22.42 8 sane
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
CATCHWORDS
BANKRUPTCY ~ discharge - application 10 months prior to expiry of
statutory period - reason to obtain credit to buy tools of trade -
large debts - no dividend ~- no contribution - application
dismissed.
Bankruptcy Act 1966
RE: PAULS KARLIS VILIPS EX PARTE: PAULS KARLIS VILIPS
NO. 381 OF 1986
FRENCH J.
PERTH
8 AUGUST 1988
IN THE FEDERAL COURT )
OF AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISION )
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT )
OF THE STATE OF )
WESTERN AUSTRALIA )
No. 381 of 1986
RE: PAULS KARLIS VILIPS
Bankrupt
EX PARTE: PAULS KARLIS VILIPS
Applicant
MINUTE OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: FRENCH J.
DATE OF ORDER: 8 AUGUST 1988
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application will be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in
Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT
OF THE STATE OF
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
No. 381 of 1986
RE: PAULS KARLIS VILIPS
Bankrupt
EX PARTE: PAULS KARLIS VILIPS
Applicant
CORAM: FRENCH J.
8 AUGUST 1988
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Pauls Karlis Vilips became bankrupt at the age of 26 years on 1
July 1986. At the date of his bankruptcy he was employed as a
roof carpenter, in receipt of a wage of about $300 a week. He
paid rent of $85 a week, and maintained two hire-purchase
agreements, one ona motor car and the other on a boat, with
Associated Midland, representing a combined commitment of $152 per
week.
His background history, as indicated by the official
receiver's report, which is not contested in any relevant respect,
indicates that although a roof carpenter by trade, in 1981 he
injured his arm while playing sport and as a result of this it was
in plaster for some three months. During the following 18 months
Mes Ge,
yo ae re ye ne
he worked intermittently as a salesman, and during that time tried
to repay debts, including commission write—backs. From August
1982 until February 1984, he worked for Stokes Music as a salesman
on a $180 per week retainer, with commission. In February 1984 he
set up a company, Ruddock Pty Ltd, with Ross Leslie Grafton and
himself as directors. Each contributed $4,000 with the aim of
selling musical instruments on consignment under the name "Perth
Keyboard City". After eight months of trading they had incurred
debts of about $20,000. Grafton was bought out of the business
for about $3,000 and the bankrupt's mother took his place as
director. Their 1984/85 turnover was somewhere between $350,000
to $400,000, but the bankrupt's salary amounted to only $19,000.
In November 1985 the company opened a shop in Carnarvon
called "Carnarvon Music Academy. Stock had previously been sold
on consignment to finance companies and, according to Mr Vilips,
consignment sales were discontinued and a floor plan scheme
entered into with Tokai Australia, a keyboard supplier. The
company ceased trading on 30 June 1986.
During its operations the company incurred $13,000 of
debts and possessed only minimal assets. Due to pressure from
creditors who had received personal guarantees from the bankrupt,
he filed his debtor's petition on 1 duly 1986.
Since bankruptcy Mr Vilips has held a number of jobs as
a carpenter and has worked as a croupier at Burswood Island
Casino. In August 1986, he sold the motor boat for $10,682. The
———
proceeds of that sale went to Associated Midland. In September
1986, the nominal equity in a Mazda 929 was sold to him for $25
and in September the following year he sold that car to pay out
what he owed to Associated Midland, leaving hima surplus of
$1,500 which was used to purchase a 1974 Holden utility said to be
necessary for his trade as a carpenter.
Mr Vilips has not at this point made any contributions
to his estate. The financial summary shows assets disclosed in
the statement of affairs totalling $570; liabilities amounting to
$29,803, with an additional $6,342 of known creditors. Proofs of
debt were not requested, but one has been lodged for $180.
Realisations amount to $25.
He seeks a discharge to enable him to obtain, on credit,
certain tools of trade, which, he says, he needs to perform
efficiently as a carpenter. The tools are to replace some stolen
from his utility which were not covered by insurance. The goods
he now wants to purchase include a generator, at a cost of $1,200;
a drop-saw of $600; and saw tools. He also wants to acquire a
lock-up trailer at $800. He says that at the moment he' cannot
work effectively as a sub-contract carpenter without tools of this
kind. He was, until recently, employed in Queensland, earning
about $300 per week as a carpenter, but returned to Perth because
it was his home and because he found the living expenses in
Queensland high.
one
Mr Vilips presently owns the 1974 Holden utility which
he purchased with the surplus from the sale of the Mazda 929. He
says that without the tools he does not seem to be getting
anywhere, and that wages work is difficult to get.
This application does not paint a particularly
impressive picture. The liabilities total in excess of $30,000.
There is virtually nothing in the estate. There have been no
contributions made. I do not criticise Mr Vilips for that because
it may well be, as he said, that the work he has been able to
obtain has not left him sufficient surplus to make any
contributions, although I do note that he is single and has no
dependents.
He seeks discharge to enable him to enter into credit
arrangements to a total of about $3,000 to purchase additional
equipment for the purposes of conducting his business as a
self-employed carpenter. Discharge is not lightly given by the
Court where sought before the expiry of the statutory 3 year
period. In these circumstances, it seems to me that the public
interest would not be served by such an order. Mr Vilips
essentially seeks release from bankruptcy in order to enable him
to enter into further credit transactions, and, of course, he
would not be limited to the particular transaction that he has
indicated. In my opinion, having regard to the substantial debts
that were incurred, the almost total absence of any assets, and
the absence of even a minimal contribution to the estate, the
public interest is best served in letting the bankruptcy run its
een
course, which would take it to another 10 months, that is, to July
1989. The application will be dismissed.
I certify that this and the preceding
four (4) pages are a true copy of the
Ex tempore Reasons for Judgment of his
Honour Justice French.
Associate: DAT Kewe
Date: ¥ F SF
Mr P.K. Vilips appeared in person.
Mr F.D. O'Driscoll appeared on behalf of the Official Receiver.
Date of Hearing: 8 August 1988
Date of Judgment: 8 August 1988
Le ree er ee en ree rr ce
wpe nee ae