Federal Court of Australia
UUDGMENT No. scl ZeQual TF...
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G 450 of 1994 GENERAL DIVISION )
~
BETWEEN: MANSIONS OF AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
Applicant
AND:
CHUBB INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Respondent
CORAM: SACKVILLE J. RECEIV PLACE: SYDNEY EIVED DATE : 19 OCTOBER 1994 25 OCT 1994 FEDERAL COURT OF
AUSTRALIA
PRINCIPAL
REGISTRY
NS FOR NT
HIS HONOUR: This is an application to amend the statement of claim by the addition of further particulars to paragraph 5 of the statement of claim as originally filed. Paragraph 5 contains an allegation that the document in issue in this case, described as "Masterpiece Coverage Comparison", was published in circumstances that constituted conduct that was misleading or deceptive or likely to be misleading or deceptive in
contravention of s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
The particulars originally provided alleged that the document contained statements concerning the applicant's insurance products, which are either inaccurate or untrue or which are representations that are misleading or deceptive, or likely to
mislead or deceive. The particulars go on to give nine specific
illustrations of the manner in which the document contains
statements that are said to be either inaccurate or untrue.
These are as follows:
(a) (b)
(¢)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(9)
(h) (i)
extended replacement cost not included;
policy requires insured to buy extra coverage for "other structures";
"special limits/jewellery/$20,000.00 total";
limit of $5,000.00 per item for "fine arts";
extra coverages/personal computer data replacement not included in policy;
debris removal not included/must be added to building sum insured;
"extra living expenses" and "unoccupancy clause" as "extra coverages";
"medical payments to others" not included;
defence coverage not included.
The application to amend is for the addition of four particulars,
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate