Jamandilovski, V. v. Telstra Corporation Ltd [1994] FCA 1012

: mcuworns JUDGMENT Now ond. O21 Po. sn

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - appeal from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - adequacy of reasons for decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - whether findings supported by medical evidence - preference of one medical expert's evidence over that of another - whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal discharged its obligations under s 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - extension of time for the institution of an appeal under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 ss 43, 44.

VLADIMIR JAMANDILOVSKI v TELSTRA RPORATION LIMITED

No NG 22 of 1994

Lindgren J 21 December 1994 Sydney 21 DEC 1994 FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

PRINCIPAL REGISTRY

ja ' vt

_ IN' THE" FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No NG 22 of 1994 GENERAL DIVISION )

ON APPEAL FROM THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY M T LEWIS (SENIOR MEMBER) J D CAMPBELL (MEMBER) AND I R WAY (MEMBER)

BETWEEN:

VLADIMIR JAMANDILOVSKI Applicant

AND

TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED Respondent

CORAM: LINDGREN J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 21 DECEMBER 1994

MINUTE OF ORDER

THE COURT ORDERS:

1. THAT the time allowed by sub-section 44 (2A) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) for the applicant to appeal to this Court under sub-section 44 (1) of that Act from the decision given on 8 December 1993 in the General Administrative Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by M T Lewis (Senior Member), J D Campbell (Member) and I R Way

(Member) in proceedings N 92/325, be extended to 19

January 1994.

2. THAT the application be dismissed.

3. THAT the applicant pay the respondent's costs.

NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in