Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wride v IP Australia [2004] FCA 282 DONALD CHARLES WRIDE v IP AUSTRALIA S 176 OF 2002 LANDER J ADELAIDE 23 MARCH 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 176 OF 2002
BETWEEN: DONALD CHARLES WRIDE
APPLICANT
AND: IP AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pursuant to O 11 r16 the amended statement of claim is struck out. 2. Pursuant to O 20 r2 the applicant's application is dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs including the costs ordered by the Full Court to be costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 176 OF 2002
BETWEEN: DONALD CHARLES WRIDE
APPLICANT
AND: IP AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE: 23 MARCH 2004
PLACE: ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 For the reasons published this day by me in the matter of Wride v Schulze (file number S 175 of 2002), except the reasons contained in paragraphs [48] to [52], I make the following orders: 1. Pursuant to O 11 r 16 the amended statement of claim is struck out. 2. Pursuant to O 20 r 2 the applicant's application is dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs including the costs ordered by the Full Court to be costs in the cause I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lander.
Associate: Dated: 23 March 2004 Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Krupka
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate