FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Wride v IP Australia [2004] FCA 282 DONALD CHARLES WRIDE v IP AUSTRALIA S 176 OF 2002 LANDER J ADELAIDE 23 MARCH 2004 IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 176 OF 2002 BETWEEN: DONALD CHARLES WRIDE APPLICANT AND: IP AUSTRALIA RESPONDENT JUDGE: LANDER J DATE OF ORDER: 23 MARCH 2004 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pursuant to O 11 r16 the amended statement of claim is struck out. 2. Pursuant to O 20 r2 the applicant's application is dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs including the costs ordered by the Full Court to be costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 176 OF 2002 BETWEEN: DONALD CHARLES WRIDE APPLICANT AND: IP AUSTRALIA RESPONDENT JUDGE: LANDER J DATE: 23 MARCH 2004 PLACE: ADELAIDE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 For the reasons published this day by me in the matter of Wride v Schulze (file number S 175 of 2002), except the reasons contained in paragraphs [48] to [52], I make the following orders: 1. Pursuant to O 11 r 16 the amended statement of claim is struck out. 2. Pursuant to O 20 r 2 the applicant's application is dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs including the costs ordered by the Full Court to be costs in the cause I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lander. Associate: Dated: 23 March 2004 Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Krupka Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 9 March 2004 Date of Judgment: 23 March 2004