Russo v Private Funds Management Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 872
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Russo v Private Funds Management Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 872
Citation: Russo v Private Funds Management Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 872
Appeal from: Russo v Private Funds Management Pty Ltd [2011] FMCA 8
Parties: ANGELO PETER RUSSO v PRIVATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT PTY LTD, ANNETTE JOY CONN and ROBERT CHRZASZCZ & ASSOCIATES
File number(s): SAD 8 of 2011
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 5 August 2011
Date of last submissions 2 June 2011
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 109
Cases cited: Mearns v Australian Litigation Fund Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 168 followed
Russo v Private Funds Management Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 542 referred to
Date of hearing: 26 May 2011
Place: Melbourne (heard in Adelaide)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Abbott
Solicitor for the Respondents: Madsen Rowley
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 8 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ANGELO PETER RUSSO
Appellant
AND: PRIVATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
First Respondent
ANNETTE JOY CONN
Second Respondent
ROBERT CHRZASZCZ & ASSOCIATES
Third Respondent
JUDGE: TRACEY J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 AUGUST 2011
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Respondents' costs of the appeal, including reserved costs, be taxed and paid out of the Appellant's estate in accordance with para 109(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 8 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ANGELO PETER RUSSO
Appellant
AND: PRIVATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
First Respondent
ANNETTE JOY CONN
Second Respondent
ROBERT CHRZASZCZ & ASSOCIATES
Third Respondent
JUDGE: TRACEY J
DATE: 5 AUGUST 2011
PLACE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 On 26 May 2011 I dismissed an appeal by Mr Russo against a decision of a Federal Magistrate who had refused to set aside a sequestration order which had been made by a Registrar of the Court: see Russo v Private Funds Management Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 542.
2 I invited the parties to file and serve written submissions as to what, if any, orders should be made relating to the costs of the unsuccessful appeal.
3 The Respondents filed a written submission seeking an order that their costs of the appeal be taxed and paid out of Mr Russo's bankrupt estate.
4 Mr Russo filed no submissions on costs.
5 The order sought by the Respondents is a usual order following unsuccessful appeals in cases such as the present: see Mearns v Australian Litigation Fund Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 168 at [4]. Such an order should be made in this case.
I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tracey.
Associate:
Dated: 5 August 2011