High Court of Australia
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ABBOTT AND ANOTHER
TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
EOW AND OTHERS ve TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Oral Judgment delivered at.....
on_Monday 3rd November 1969
Sydney
ABBOTT AND ANOTHER Ve
TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
ROW AND OTHERS Ve
'TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
iS js) fs
Special leave to appeal refused with costs.
ABBOTT AND ANOTHER \ ve
TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
ROW AND OTHERS
Ve
TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
CUDGMENT. BARWICK C.J. (ORAL)
ABBOTT AND ANOTHER ve
TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
ROW AND OTHERS Ve
'TOWNLEY AND OTHERS
A majority of the Court is of opinion that clause 8 of the award as amended by the Central Sugar Cane Prices Board was within the power conferred by s. 58 (6) of The Regulation of Sugar CarePrices Act, 1962-1966 to provide in the award for deductions from the base price in respect of burnt, frosted, dried-up, diseased, decayed, badly topped, trashy or dirty sugar cane, and being of that opinion and for that reason alone the majority would refuse special leave.
The order of the Court, by majority; is that
special leave is refused with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate