IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA ABBOTT AND ANOTHER TOWNLEY AND OTHERS EOW AND OTHERS ve TOWNLEY AND OTHERS REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Oral Judgment delivered at..... on_Monday 3rd November 1969 Sydney ABBOTT AND ANOTHER Ve TOWNLEY AND OTHERS ROW AND OTHERS Ve 'TOWNLEY AND OTHERS iS js) fs Special leave to appeal refused with costs. ABBOTT AND ANOTHER \ ve TOWNLEY AND OTHERS ROW AND OTHERS Ve TOWNLEY AND OTHERS CUDGMENT. BARWICK C.J. (ORAL) ABBOTT AND ANOTHER ve TOWNLEY AND OTHERS ROW AND OTHERS Ve 'TOWNLEY AND OTHERS A majority of the Court is of opinion that clause 8 of the award as amended by the Central Sugar Cane Prices Board was within the power conferred by s. 58 (6) of The Regulation of Sugar CarePrices Act, 1962-1966 to provide in the award for deductions from the base price in respect of burnt, frosted, dried-up, diseased, decayed, badly topped, trashy or dirty sugar cane, and being of that opinion and for that reason alone the majority would refuse special leave. The order of the Court, by majority; is that special leave is refused with costs.