High Court of Australia
IN| THE HIGH COURT GF AUSTRALIA
«
THE QUEEN
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Oral Judgment delivered at......2.-...--. Tuesday 8th Dec
ORDER
Application for special leave to appeal refused.
DUGAN
Ve
JUDGMENT BARWICK C.J. (ORAL)
DUGAN
Ve
THE QUEEN
Mr. Vizard has put before us, very fairly and very fully, a number of criticisms of the summing-up of the learned trial judge and on those has based a submission that the trial miscarried.
However, having listened to all that he has said and having read the judgments of the Court of Criminal Appeal, the summing-up and the passages in the evidence to which reference has been made, I find no reason myself to doubt the propriety of the conclusions and the opinions to which the Court of Criminal Appeal came and which they expressed in their judgments,
For that reason, in my opinion, this is not a
case for the grant of special leave to appeal.
UDGMENT McTIERNAN J. ORAL .
DUGAN Ve
THE QUEEN
I am of the same opinion.
DUGAN
Vv.
THE QUEEN
IUDGMENT ; MENZIES J. (ORAL)
THE QUEEN
I agree.
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
DUGAN
ve
THE QUEEN
WINDEYER J.
DUGAN
Ve
THE QUEEN
I agree.
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
DUGAN
Ve
THE QUEEN
OWEN J.
o
THE QUEEN
I agree.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate