High Court of Australia
&
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NO.17390/34 GRANTED T0..FRITS..JOHAN HOLMBERG.
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Judgment delivered at
H.R aw, Go Print, Mob . : .. c.1nss0/4s on
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NO, 1
GRANTED TO FRITS JOHAN HOLMBERG
JUDGMENT. LO@rL)
0,
IX_THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NO. 17390/3k
GRANTED 7O FRITS JOHAN HOLMBERG
JUDGMENT FULLAGAR J. CORAL) ~
This patent expired on 2nd May 1950. No profits have been realized from it from any source except Australia, although the invention has been patented in Great Britain and New Zealand. I think that loss due to the war has been established, and thet the only question is whether the high figures of pro- duction and sale from 1947 onwards do not reflect what is sometimes called a "banked up demand". In other words, to quote Mr. Justice Tomlin, as he then was, in Higginson v. Arundel's Patent 4 R.P.C. 436, is this a case in which "what the war has taken away with the one hand, it has given back with the other"? The matter is of course incapable of proof one way or the other, but I think it fair to infer that the turnover would have been very substantial from about 1940 onwards if war had not occurred. I must have regard to post-war difficulties in obtaining labour end material. There is, I think, ground for thinking that the average over the ten years 1940-1950 would have been inuch higher if there had been no war. I think, however, that some allowance should be made for increased post-war building activity. The invention, though I do not pretend to have studied it closely and I am not in a position to express a concluded opinion on it, appears to be one of merit. On the whole, taking all the circumstances into consideration, I am of opinion that an extension for four years is reasonable in this case, and I will extend the term of the patent for four years from the date of expiry. The patent having expired, a re~grant will, of course, be necessary,
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate