IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NO. 17390/34 GRANTED TO FRITS JOHAN HOLMBERG
High Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
&
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT
NO.17390/34 GRANTED T0..FRITS..JOHAN
HOLMBERG.
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Judgment delivered at
H.R aw, Go Print, Mob
. : ..
c.1nss0/4s on
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NO, 1
GRANTED TO FRITS JOHAN HOLMBERG
JUDGMENT.
LO@rL)
0,
IX_THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NO. 17390/3k
GRANTED 7O FRITS JOHAN HOLMBERG
JUDGMENT FULLAGAR J.
CORAL) ~
This patent expired on 2nd May 1950. No profits
have been realized from it from any source except Australia,
although the invention has been patented in Great Britain and
New Zealand. I think that loss due to the war has been established,
and thet the only question is whether the high figures of pro-
duction and sale from 1947 onwards do not reflect what is sometimes
called a "banked up demand". In other words, to quote
Mr. Justice Tomlin, as he then was, in Higginson v. Arundel's
Patent 4 R.P.C. 436, is this a case in which "what the war has
taken away with the one hand, it has given back with the other"?
The matter is of course incapable of proof one way or the other,
but I think it fair to infer that the turnover would have been
very substantial from about 1940 onwards if war had not occurred.
I must have regard to post-war difficulties in obtaining labour
end material. There is, I think, ground for thinking that the
average over the ten years 1940-1950 would have been inuch higher
if there had been no war. I think, however, that some allowance
should be made for increased post-war building activity. The
invention, though I do not pretend to have studied it closely and
I am not in a position to express a concluded opinion on it,
appears to be one of merit. On the whole, taking all the
circumstances into consideration, I am of opinion that an extension
for four years is reasonable in this case, and I will extend the
term of the patent for four years from the date of expiry. The
patent having expired, a re~grant will, of course, be necessary,
and the order will take the form settled by Mr. Justice Dixon in
the Celotex Case, The applicant must pay the Commissioner's
costs.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.