High Court of Australia
RDALE TIMBER Coy. Pty. Ltd, v JONES.
JUDGMENT.
It is admitted that the cnly question which remains open for argument is whether the Company is, by force of section 29(ba) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-192 bound by the award of the 18th Decenbér 1920. If it comes within, the terms of that enactment it is so bound and we all think that
on the evidence it does come.within those terms.
Tue crder nisi must be discharged with costs,
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate