RDALE TIMBER Coy. Pty. Ltd, v JONES. JUDGMENT. It is admitted that the cnly question which remains open for argument is whether the Company is, by force of section 29(ba) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-192 bound by the award of the 18th Decenbér 1920. If it comes within, the terms of that enactment it is so bound and we all think that on the evidence it does come.within those terms. Tue crder nisi must be discharged with costs,