High Court of Australia
| | ; i
an a HAD
ve
a - ARCHER
! REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Oral
Judgment delivered at____Sydney......... vember 1967.
on_Wednesday, ist.)
} = } 'A.C. Brooks, Government Pinter, Melbourne .7030/60
ve
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
ve
BARWICK C.J.
HeTTERVAN J.
KITTO J. MENZIES J.
Ve
ARCHER
The Court has heard the argument for the appellant, and notwithstanding what has been put in support of the submissions that have been made, the Court sees no good reason for differing from the result at which the Supreme Court arrived. The Court would dismiss this appeal and affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court, substantially for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Sugerman. The order of the Court will be that the appeal
is dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate