| | ; i an a HAD ve a - ARCHER ! REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Oral Judgment delivered at____Sydney......... vember 1967. on_Wednesday, ist.) } = } 'A.C. Brooks, Government Pinter, Melbourne .7030/60 ve ORDER Appeal dismissed with costs. ve BARWICK C.J. HeTTERVAN J. KITTO J. MENZIES J. Ve ARCHER The Court has heard the argument for the appellant, and notwithstanding what has been put in support of the submissions that have been made, the Court sees no good reason for differing from the result at which the Supreme Court arrived. The Court would dismiss this appeal and affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court, substantially for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Sugerman. The order of the Court will be that the appeal is dismissed with costs.