High Court of Australia
7) -4- 1092
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR WRITS OF
PROHIBITION, MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AGAINST THE
AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION; EX PARTE
| THE CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY AND MINING EMPLOYEES UNION
JUDGMENT McHUGH J.
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION, MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AGAINST THE AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION; EX PARTE
THE CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY AND MINING EMPLOYEES UNION
The Construction, Forestry and Mining Employees Union, an organisation registered under the Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth), ("the organisation") seeks orders nisi for writs of prohibition, mandamus, and certiorari against The Australian Industrial Relations Commission in respect of the proposed amalgamation of four organisations which are also registered under the Act. The organisation contends that the Commission has failed to exercise or has exceeded its jurisdiction because it has held that, in a hearing under s.250 of the Act for "the granting of an approval for the submission of the amalgamation to ballot", the organisation had no right to ask the Commission to dismiss the proceedings pursuant to s.111(1)(g) of the Act. That paragraph enables the Commission to dismiss proceedings in the Commission on the ground, inter alia, that they "are not necessary or desirable in the
public interest".
Division 7 of Pt IX of the Act provides for the amalgamation of organisations which, by definition, means organisations "registered under this Act".
Section 242(1), which is found in Div.7, provides:
"The existing organisations concerned in a proposed amalgamation, and any association proposed to be registered as an organisation under the amalgamation, must jointly lodge in the Industrial Registry an application for approval for the submission of the amalgamation to ballot."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate