High Court of Australia
ORDER
Application dismissed.
EVERYONE
v.
STATE OF TASMANIA
19783 -039
EVERYONE v.
STATE OF TASMANIA
JUDGMENT GIBBS C.J.
(Oral)
EVERYONE ve
STATE OF TASMANIA
This is an application for an injunction directed to the State of Tasmania to restrain it from obstructing the Gordon and
Franklin Rivers.
The affidavit in support states that the Hydro-Electric
Commission of Tasmania is threatening to contravene section 3 of the
Toe
Tasmantan Rivers Pollution Act of 1881.
The plaintiff describes himself as an ecologist of St Kilda in the State of Victoria. He goes on to state that he has caused warrants to be issued for the apprehension of eight Federal Ministers - the warrants have not been executed, nor have they been set aside - and that he applies for relief by way of injunction pending the appearance
of those Ministers at the magistrate's court.
He further says that the cause of his action is the reported destruction of areas of the south-west Tasmanian wilderness by the
Hydro-Electric Commission of Tasmania.
Since the applicant is appearing in person I am stating what would, I think, be obvious to any legal representative, namely my reasons for holding that the applicant lacks standing to make this
application.
The rule as to standing has been laid down by this Court in a number of recent cases, the most important of which is The Australian Conservation Foundation Incorporated v. The Commonwealth of Australia
C939)
reported in 28 ALR 257. It is clear that an ordinary member of the
public has no standing to sue to prevent the violation of a public
right such as the alleged breach of a section of the Tasmanian Rivers Pollution Act, unless he has, at the same time, a private right of his own which was interfered with or had suffered special damage peculiar
to himself.
A mere intellectual or emotional concern with what is being done to the environment does not amount to damage or interest within the meaning of the rule. That is plainly established by the Australian Conservation case. Nor can a: person who lacks any special interest give himself one by causing warrants to be issued for the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate