High Court of Australia
Deltuust 27 Many Gee
Ancona
Judgment - Edwards V_ The King
My brother Starke and I are of the opinion that there was no weng. decision of any question of law or any miscarriage of
justice within Section 6 of the Crimkinsl 4ppesle Act, 1924
for 'whion the aouvietion should be set aside. My brothers bixon and xvatt are of the opinion that upon the twi itema of eorrobération upon which the Chief Justice relied the evidence wae insufficient. to submit to the jury and that, because of thie, the failure of the Ghief Justice to direct the jur} as to the purpose for which the evidence of the eventea at Victor Harbor might be relied ujon, the sonvietion should net stand. In thia division of opinion the decision of the Supreme Court
must be upheld and the appeal @iamissed,
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate