NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 14) [2020] NSWSC 1165 Hearing dates: 20, 21, 24 August 2020 Date of orders: 31 August 2020 Decision date: 31 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The listening device recorded on 4 May 2017 at 00:52:15 under warrant SD 17/0185 is inadmissible. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence - spirited and multifaceted objection - listening device recording - conversation in Mandarin - inconsistent translations - mysteries, infelicities and uncertainties - impact on probative value - carried v bring or brought - loaded expression - Urban Dictionary - leap of faith - unfair prejudice - where accused required to establish other criminal offence to explain recording - whether evidence might be confusing or misleading - evidence inadmissible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 135 and 137 Cases Cited: IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 R v Bridgman (1980) 24 SASR 278 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335; 237 A Crim R 238 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 R v Power (1996) 87 A Crim R 407 R v Taranto; R v Freeman [1999] NSWCCA 396 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate