NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Karimjee [2021] NSWCA 179 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 17 August 2021 Decision date: 17 August 2021 Before: Meagher JA, Payne JA, McCallum JA Decision: (1) Order pursuant to s 7 of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) on the grounds set out in ss 8(1)(d) and 8(1)(e) prohibiting for a period of 80 years the disclosure by publication or otherwise anywhere in the Commonwealth of Australia of: (a) the identities of the alleged victims, or the parents or other family members of the alleged victims, in respect of proceedings 2012/280081, 2012/285455 and 2012/285639, or information tending to reveal the identity of those persons in connection with these proceedings; and (b) the name that is underlined in paragraph [25] of the confidential Agreed Statement of Facts filed contemporaneously with the Amended Summons in these proceedings; (2) Declare that Hussein Karimjee is not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers maintained pursuant to s 22 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law; (3) Order that the name Hussein Karimjee be removed from the roll. Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – disciplinary proceedings – practitioner convicted of offence under s 319 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – whether probably permanently unfit to practise – order removing name from roll CIVIL PROCEDURE – hearings – suppression and non-publication orders – whether necessary to ensure consistency with extant suppression order of the District Court – where name published in publicly available judgments – no basis for order Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), ss 7, 8 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 319 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 131.1(1) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), s 22 Cases Cited: A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253; [2004] HCA 1 A2 v R; Magennis v R; Vaziri v R [2018] NSWCCA 174 A2 v R; Magennis v R; Vaziri v R [2020] NSWCCA 7 Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (2019) 100 NSWLR 734; [2019] NSWCA 245 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Jafari [2020] NSWCA 53 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Parente [2019] NSWCA 33 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Zhukovska [2020] NSWCA 163 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Costigan [2013] NSWCA 407 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Einfeld [2009] NSWCA 255 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Power (2008) 71 NSWLR 451; [2008] NSWCA 135 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Siggins [2021] NSWCA 40 Ex parte Lenehan (1948) 77 CLR 403 Kennedy v The Council of the Incorporated Law Institute of New South Wales (1939) 13 ALJR 563 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v McCaffery [2004] NSWCA 470 R v A2 [2019] HCA 35; (2019) 93 ALJR 1106 R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No 13) [2015] NSWSC 1543 R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1221 R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1306 R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No 8) [2015] NSWSC 1472 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) Hussein Karimjee (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: TL Wong and S Jeliba (Applicant) J Sutton – solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate