DRUMMOND v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED [1995] NSWCA 133
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
DRUMMOND v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
SHELLER JA
4 September 1995
[1995] NSWCA 133
Sheller JA. This is an application by the appellant, Margaret Elizabeth
Drummond, that the hearing of her appeal against the National Australia Bank
Limited be expedited and that there be a stay of the enforcement of the orders of
Justice Giles made on 28 July 1995.
The application for the stay is supported by an affidavit by David Paul
Courtenay of 24 August and an affidavit of Margaret Elizabeth Drummond of 29
August 1995. The property the subject of the order for possession made by
Justice Giles is the appellant's sole place of residence. The appellant is divorced
and has the custody of four children aged between six and sixteen years.
Mrs Drummond sets out in her affidavit the disruption that would be caused to
the family if the family home were sold.
Ihave not read the judgment of Justice Giles, however, Mr Muir, who appears
for the bank, frankly concedes that this is not in any sense a frivolous appeal.
Indeed the parties think that it is an appeal that may take two days to hear. I am
told that Justice Giles" judgment was seventy-one pages in length.
In all the circumstances and although the amount claimed against Mrs
Drummond exceeds $700,000 and the house is currently valued at between
$600,000 and $800,000, I think the case is one in which a stay should be made
and I propose to so order.
The question of whether the appeal should be expedited is a matter which will
be dealt with in chambers on an application by the parties by the judge who is
currently dealing with expedition matters. I understand that both parties agree
that the appeal should be expedited.
The order I make is that the orders made by Justice Giles on 28 July 1995 be
stayed until the determination of the appeal by this Court or further order.
The costs of this application will be costs in the appeal.
Orders accordingly.