NSW Caselaw
ISUZU GENERAL MOTORS AUSTRALIA LIMITED v BLAKE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ and MEAGHER JA 11 March 1996
[1996] NSWCA 269
Gleeson CJ. Notwithstanding the cogent submissions that have been advanced by Mr Leahy of counsel on behalf of the claimant, I am not persuaded that there is any substantial reason why an appellate Court should interfere with the discretionary decision of Newman J at first instance. His Honour's reasons for that decision reveal no error of fact or principle and the case is not a proper one for appellate intervention.
I would propose that the application for leave to appeal be dismissed with costs.
Meagher JA. I agree. Gleeson CJ. The order of the Court will be as I have proposed.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate