ISUZU GENERAL MOTORS AUSTRALIA LIMITED v BLAKE [1996] NSWCA 269
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
ISUZU GENERAL MOTORS AUSTRALIA LIMITED v BLAKE
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ and MEAGHER JA
11 March 1996
[1996] NSWCA 269
Gleeson CJ. Notwithstanding the cogent submissions that have been advanced
by Mr Leahy of counsel on behalf of the claimant, I am not persuaded that there
is any substantial reason why an appellate Court should interfere with the
discretionary decision of Newman J at first instance. His Honour's reasons for
that decision reveal no error of fact or principle and the case is not a proper one
for appellate intervention.
I would propose that the application for leave to appeal be dismissed with
costs.
Meagher JA. I agree.
Gleeson CJ. The order of the Court will be as I have proposed.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.