NSW Caselaw
SEERS v TERRELL SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MASON P 24 March 1997
[1997] NSWCA 280
Mason P. This is a matter in which I propose to order a stay. It is unfortunate that the Court does not have the benefit of the judgment, but it seems inappropriate that we should wait and incur further costs.
It appears to me that the appellant has an arguable case as to liability in this matter. The other fact I take into account is that the time from the accident has been two and a half years. I would anticipate that this matter could be dealt with in the Court of Appeal within the next six months on the assumption that the appellant seeks expedition.
Will there be an undertaking that that will be sought?
RUSSELL: Yes, that application will be made.
HIS HONOUR: The order that I make is that execution of the judgment is stayed. I note that the appellant will seek expedition. Costs in this motion to be costs in the appeal.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate