Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
SEERS v TERRELL
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MASON P
24 March 1997
[1997] NSWCA 280
Mason P. This is a matter in which I propose to order a stay. It is unfortunate
that the Court does not have the benefit of the judgment, but it seems
inappropriate that we should wait and incur further costs.
It appears to me that the appellant has an arguable case as to liability in this
matter. The other fact I take into account is that the time from the accident has
been two and a half years. I would anticipate that this matter could be dealt with
in the Court of Appeal within the next six months on the assumption that the
appellant seeks expedition.
Will there be an undertaking that that will be sought?
RUSSELL: Yes, that application will be made.
HIS HONOUR: The order that I make is that execution of the judgment is
stayed. I note that the appellant will seek expedition. Costs in this motion to be
costs in the appeal.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.