NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel
CITATION: Lloyd -v- Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (GD) [2001] NSWADTAP 26 APPELLANT PARTIES: Ronald George Lloyd RESPONDENT Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee FILE NUMBER: 009026 HEARING DATES: 25/10/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 10/25/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 08/15/2001
Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Ronald George Lloyd [2000] NSWADT 98 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Latham M - DCJ (Deputy President); Fleming G - Judicial Member; Mayo-Ramsay R - Member CATCHWORDS: opportunity to be heard - reconstitution of Tribunal during hearing - statutory interpretation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 4004/98, 4005/98, 40015/98, 40016/98 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 07/27/2000 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Ronald George Lloyd [2000] NSWADT 98 Chua Chee Chor v Chua Kim Yong [1962] 1 WLR 1464 Wentworth v Rogers (No 3) (1986) 6 NSWLR 642 Seables Pty Ltd v Smith (1997) 6 Tas R 350 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1980-1981] 147 CLR 297 K & S Lake City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd (1985) 60 ALR 509 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd [1995-1997] 187 CLR 384 Project Blue Sky v ABA [1998] 194 CLR 355 Kingston v Keprose Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 404 Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405 Beckwith v R (1976) 135 CLR 569 CASES CITED: Trade Practices Commission v Gillette Co (No 2) (1993) 118 Liu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 49 ALR 280 R v Young [1999] NSWCCA 166 Thompson v Goold & Co [1910] AC 409 Vickers, Sons & Maxim Ltd v Evans [1910] AC 444 Wills v Bowley [1983] 1 AC 57 Ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 4 ALD 139 A & B v Director of Family Services [1996] ACTSC 48 Casey v Repatriation Commission (1995) 39 ALD 34 Ileris and Comcare [1999] AATA 647 Re Saverio Barbaro and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1980) 3 ALD 1 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: N Gye, barrister RESPONDENT S Burchett, barrister ORDERS: 1 Appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate