NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Prothonotary of the Supreme Court NSW v Carr [2004] NSWCA 2 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/12/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Tobias JA at 1; McColl JA at 1 DECISION : Declarations 1, 2 and 3 made as sought; order 4 made as sought and no order as to costs.
Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales PARTIES : v Peter David Carr FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40753/03 COUNSEL : A: D Dickinson & R Collins R: In Person SOLICITORS : A: I V Knight Crown Solicitor R: N/A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40753 of 2003
MEAGHER JA TOBIAS JA McCOLL JA
Thursday 18 December 2003 PROTHONOTARY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES v PETER DAVID CARR Judgment 1 MEAGHER JA: This is an application by the Acting Prothonotary of the Supreme Court for certain orders against the opponent, Mr Peter David Carr, a person who is at the moment but not for very long, a solicitor of this Court. 2 He has been convicted on various charges, such as defrauding a company while being a director and of fraudulently misappropriating moneys for his own use. He has pleaded guilty for those charges and been convicted of them and served whatever sentences had to be served. His name still remains on the roll of solicitors where it obviously does not belong. These proceedings are brought in order to tidy up that state of affairs. 3 The Court will make declarations 1, 2 and 3 as sought, order 4 as sought and there will be no order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate