New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Prothonotary of the Supreme Court NSW v Carr [2004] NSWCA 2 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/12/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 December 2003 JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Tobias JA at 1; McColl JA at 1 DECISION : Declarations 1, 2 and 3 made as sought; order 4 made as sought and no order as to costs. Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales PARTIES : v Peter David Carr FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40753/03 COUNSEL : A: D Dickinson & R Collins R: In Person SOLICITORS : A: I V Knight Crown Solicitor R: N/A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40753 of 2003 MEAGHER JA TOBIAS JA McCOLL JA Thursday 18 December 2003 PROTHONOTARY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES v PETER DAVID CARR Judgment 1 MEAGHER JA: This is an application by the Acting Prothonotary of the Supreme Court for certain orders against the opponent, Mr Peter David Carr, a person who is at the moment but not for very long, a solicitor of this Court. 2 He has been convicted on various charges, such as defrauding a company while being a director and of fraudulently misappropriating moneys for his own use. He has pleaded guilty for those charges and been convicted of them and served whatever sentences had to be served. His name still remains on the roll of solicitors where it obviously does not belong. These proceedings are brought in order to tidy up that state of affairs. 3 The Court will make declarations 1, 2 and 3 as sought, order 4 as sought and there will be no order as to costs. ****** Last Modified: 02/06/2004 DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.