LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. OFO; 10 CONWAY AVENUE, ROSE BAY PTY. LIMITED v. OFO [2006] NSWSC 384

New South Wales Supreme Court

CITATION : LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. OFO; 10 CONWAY AVENUE, ROSE BAY PTY. LIMITED v. OFO [2006] NSWSC 384

HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 1 December 2005 JURISDICTION : Common Law

JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1

EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/04/2006

DECISION : (a) The defendant's notice of motion dated 16 November 2005 is dismissed. (b) The writ of possession is stayed until 9.00 am on Tuesday 23 May 2006. (c) I make no order as to costs. In relation to proceedings no. 10406 of 2005, 10 Conway Avenue, Rose Bay Pty. Limited v. Ofo, I grant liberty to the parties to approach the registrar to have those proceedings re-listed.

PARTIES : LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. TALILOTU OFO 10 CONWAY AVENUE, ROSE BAY PTY. LIMITED v. TALILOTU OFO

FILE NUMBER(S) : SC No. 10118 of 2005;; No. 10406 of 2005

COUNSEL : Plaintiff: J. Doyle Defendant: In person

SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: R.L. Kremnizer & Co. Defendant: In person

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court (Associate Judge)

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : No. 10118 of 2005

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Malpass, As.J.

LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : 10/11/2005

LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION : LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. OFO [2005] NSWSC 984

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION POSSESSION LIST

HALL, J

THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006

No. 10118 of 2005 No. 10406 of 2005

LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v TALILOTU OFO 10 CONWAY AVENUE ROSE BAY PTY LIMITED v TALILOTU OFO

JUDGMENT

1 HALL, J: I today handed down reasons for judgment. That judgment, in paragraph [88], set out the orders proposed.

2 I provided the parties with the opportunity of considering the proposed orders and for that purpose stood the proceedings over to 3.00 pm today. Mr. J. Doyle of counsel appears for the plaintiff and Ms. Ofo, again, appears in person.