New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. OFO; 10 CONWAY AVENUE, ROSE BAY PTY. LIMITED v. OFO [2006] NSWSC 384 HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 1 December 2005 JURISDICTION : Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/04/2006 DECISION : (a) The defendant's notice of motion dated 16 November 2005 is dismissed. (b) The writ of possession is stayed until 9.00 am on Tuesday 23 May 2006. (c) I make no order as to costs. In relation to proceedings no. 10406 of 2005, 10 Conway Avenue, Rose Bay Pty. Limited v. Ofo, I grant liberty to the parties to approach the registrar to have those proceedings re-listed. PARTIES : LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. TALILOTU OFO 10 CONWAY AVENUE, ROSE BAY PTY. LIMITED v. TALILOTU OFO FILE NUMBER(S) : SC No. 10118 of 2005;; No. 10406 of 2005 COUNSEL : Plaintiff: J. Doyle Defendant: In person SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: R.L. Kremnizer & Co. Defendant: In person LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court (Associate Judge) LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : No. 10118 of 2005 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Malpass, As.J. LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : 10/11/2005 LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION : LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v. OFO [2005] NSWSC 984 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION POSSESSION LIST HALL, J THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006 No. 10118 of 2005 No. 10406 of 2005 LAWTEAL PTY. LIMITED v TALILOTU OFO 10 CONWAY AVENUE ROSE BAY PTY LIMITED v TALILOTU OFO JUDGMENT 1 HALL, J: I today handed down reasons for judgment. That judgment, in paragraph [88], set out the orders proposed. 2 I provided the parties with the opportunity of considering the proposed orders and for that purpose stood the proceedings over to 3.00 pm today. Mr. J. Doyle of counsel appears for the plaintiff and Ms. Ofo, again, appears in person. 3 There are two matters that I wish to record concerning the proposed orders. First, my attention has been drawn to a notice of motion filed on behalf of the plaintiff on 24 March 2006 in proceedings no. 10118 of 2005, Lawteal Pty. Limited v. Ofo, in which an order was sought that the writ of possession in these proceedings issued on 30 March 2003 be extended until 29 March 2007. That notice of motion was supported by the affidavit of Nicole Stein sworn 23 March 2006. I am informed that, on that date, 24 March 2006, an order was made as sought in paragraph [1] of the notice of motion, and the writ of possession, accordingly by that order, has been continued until 29 March 2007. The notification of the record of proceedings confirms the making of that order on that date. 4 Accordingly, there is no requirement for me to make an order referred to in paragraph [84] of the judgment delivered earlier today. 5 The second matter is the confirmation of orders to be made consequent upon today's judgment. Mr. Doyle provided to me minutes of orders which I have dated today and initialled. Those orders give effect to the judgment in the proceedings and, accordingly, in accordance with the short minutes, I make the following orders:- (a) That the defendant's notice of motion dated 16 November 2005 is dismissed. (b) The writ of possession is stayed until 9.00 am on Tuesday 23 May 2006. (c) I make no order as to costs. 6 In relation to proceedings no. 10406 of 2005, 10 Conway Avenue, Rose Bay Pty. Limited v. Ofo, I grant liberty to the parties to approach the registrar to have those proceedings re-listed. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.