NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Schmidt (No. 2) [2017] NSWCATOD 17 Hearing dates: 23 January 2017 Date of orders: 27 January 2017 Decision date: 27 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Marks ADCJ. Principal Member Decision: The appellant is to pay the costs of the respondent in the proceedings in an amount to be assessed by a costs assessor under the legal costs legislation (as defined in section 3A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act, 2014) in default of agreement. Catchwords: Unsuccessful appeal by HCCC – costs - constitution of the Tribunal - held usual rule that costs follow the event not displaced - costs order made Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, s165B, cl 13 of Schedule 5D Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013, s4 Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Schmidt [2016] NSWCATOD 145 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Mobile Innovations Limited v Vodafone Pacific Ltd [2003] NSWSC 423 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534 Category: Costs Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Appellant) Dr John Andrew Schmidt (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Hall SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Appellant) Avant Law (Respondent) File Number(s): 1620005 Publication restriction: Non-publication order extending to the identification of any patient of the Respondent and the mother of Patient A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate