NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ho v Berger [2019] NSWCATOD 128 Hearing dates: 15 May 2019 Date of orders: 15 May 2019 Decision date: 22 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Hon G Mullane ADCJ, Principal Member M Riordan, Senior Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: 15 May 2019:
(1) The Applicants are to file and serve a list of expenses incurred within14 Days. (2) The Respondent is to file and serve any objections within 7 days of receipt of the list. (3) The Respondent must pay the Applicant, Tessalonica Ho, within 7 days $25,000.00 by way of compensation. (4) The Respondent must pay the Applicant, Andrew Ho, within 7 days $25,000.00 by way of compensation.
22 August 2019:
(5) The Respondent must pay to the Applicant, Andrew Ho, the sum of $1,180.60 towards his costs of or incidental to these proceedings; and (6) The Respondent must pay to the Applicant, Tessalonica Ho, the sum of $ 1,007.60 towards her costs of or incidental to these proceedings. Catchwords: Professions and trades, Solicitor stakeholder, unethical and fraudulent dealing with deposit, unsatisfactory professional conduct, or professional misconduct, resulting in loss to aggrieved person. Compensation order by Tribunal. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act, 2004; Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW); Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act (2014) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: None cited Texts Cited: None Cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew H Ho (First Applicant) Tessalonica Ho (Second Applicant) Victor Berger (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: First Applicant (Self Represented) Second Applicant (Self Represented) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2018/00122174 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate